Archive for the ‘Politics’ Category
An anonymous web commenter claims to work for the Obama campaign and have knowledge of a vast conspiracy to rig poll results, manipulate the media, and “infiltrate YouTube videos” on behalf of the Obama campaign. The comment is in reply to a post at Hillbuzz where the author thinks an audiotape of Michelle Obama saying all sorts of craziness is about to be released because her traffic is down. And of course, said audiotape is supposedly a recording from when Michelle called up the folks at a wordpress blog. A wordpress blog that said they were going to release the tape a week ago and still haven’t.
So again, a crazy implausible story set in the comments of another crazy implausible post about a third crazy implausible story. All of which have absolutely no evidence behind them. Riverdaughter’s reaction:
We have no confirmation that Sarah P. is what she says she is but her story sure sounds right. It’s what we have independently observed since the beginning of the primary season. Sarah’s testimony is very plausible. It is one big game of psychological warfare perpetrated on us by Obama and his sneaky campaign.
Jesus Tapdancing Christ, she’s finally lost it. Riverdaughter has certainly never been the sharpest knife in the drawer, but this is just magical thinking at it’s worst. In this post, you have seen Riverdaughter lose her last bit of critical thinking faculty, and really, it’s just fucking sad.
I imagine this “confession” is so appealing to Riverdaughter because it strokes her and the other PUMAs’ egos in just the right way. From the comment at Hillbuzz:
We pay people and organize people to go to all the online sites and “play the part of a clinton or mccain supporter who just switched our support for obama”
We do this to stifle your motivation and to destroy your confidence.
We did this the whole primary and it worked.
Next, we infiltrate all the blogs and all the youtube videos and overwhelm the voting, the comments, etc. All to continue this appearance of overwhelming world support.
This brilliantly validates the persecution complex Riverdaughter and the rest of PUMAs have been cultivating since the primaries. Despite all facts to the contrary, they have a psychological need to feel that their enemies care about them, and that world events are transpiring exactly the way they wish. They want to be persecuted, because it means that their movement is important and powerful. So Riverdaughter relies on an anyonymous internet comment rather than empirical data, because the latter is not telling her exactly what she wants to hear. No one really disagrees with her, they’re just all paid hacks. And Obama’s not really winning, it’s just one massive conspiracy to deny the TROOF!
I tell you what, Riverdaughter, maybe you’re right, maybe the Obama campaign is doing everything this “Sarah P.” says they are. How do you know she’s not one of the paid hacks? Did you think of that? Maybe she posted this comment to make you and all the other PUMAs complacent. It’s psy-ops at it’s worst!
Let me let you in on a little secret, Riverdaughter: Sarah P. is really Michelle Obama. How do I know this? Well because she called me up the other day. She told me that she’s doing her best to ratfuck the PUMAs, because in reality there are millions of them and they could swing the election to McCain. She even mentioned you personally, saying how dangerous you were because you were convincing millions of Hillary voters to vote for McCain or stay home. Little did Michelle know that I recorded the whole conversation, and I’ll be posting it here tomorrow. This is going to blow the election wide open.
At least that what I’d have to conclude if I subscribed to the logic of one Joseph Cannon. Displaying his usual penchant for preeing sanctimoniousness and righteous anger, Joseph waxes hyberbolic at his blog today, noting that the mugging of Ashley Todd obviously indicates that:
Obama has given rise to a Mao-like cult of personality. He has never done anything to rein in these Messianic illusions — in fact, he has fostered them. That attitude gives him indirect responsibility for the violence committed and threatened by his followers.
Riiiiiiiight. Nevermind the fact that according to her own story, she was mugged before the attacker saw the McCain sticker on her car (meaning the attack was not initially political). Or that noted liberal Michelle Malkin thinks it’s possible that this might be a hoax. No, to Joseph, this obviously means that rioting horde of Obama supporters will launching pogroms tomorrow, wiping out all unbelievers of the One.
This is, of course, Joseph’s schtick: guilt by association run amok. One Obama supporter (most likely mentally deranged) committs an act of violence, thus the millions of other Obama supporters in this country are about to start killing everyone. And Barack Obama himself is ultimately responsible, because…well, because Joseph hates him a lot. As an Obama supporter, I take personal offense that Joseph thinks I’m about to start murdering people, but Joe’s pretty set in his persecution complex, so I doubt he gives a rat’s ass.
Incidentally, this is basically how Joseph became an Obama hater in the first place. He supported Hillary Clinton in the primaries (as did I), and he got into internet spats with some people at Daily Kos and Democratic Underground, so he blamed their meanness on Barack Obama, and became an anyone-but-Obama voter. Now to someone who’s life doesn’t revolve around DK and DU, that might seem like an extemely petty and stupid reason to completely change one’s political ideology, but ole Joe’s been running with it since the primaries.
So following Joseph’s lead, I’m just going to assume from now on that all people that share his name are sanctimonious hyperbolic pricks. And should anyone ever cross me, whether they be an 18 year old in his parents’ basement going by the handle of “drfunky571992” or merely a two year old who calls me “poopyface”, I’m going to ultimately blame their actions on one Joseph Cannon. I’m fraught with anticipation for my new life of lonliness and crippling anger.
UPDATE (10/24/2008 1:49 PM EDT): Ashley Todd just admitted she made the whole thing up. I’m sure a correction from Joseph will be forthcoming.
I’ve remarked before that PUMAs are perhaps the stupidest group of people I’ve ever encountered on the internet (well, short of YouTube commenters). Lady Boomer NYC provides the example par excellence in describing her secret weapon to take down Barack Obama:
Concurring with riverdaughter about the anger, I think it’s time to bring out the heavy-duty tools—as in prayer and intention! You know about The Secret? Sshhh, don’t tell, but as Norman Vincent Peale and healers believe, “You Can If You Think You Can.” It’s like The Little Engine That Could, right? I saw The Secret the movie, didn’t read the book, hah, but it’s about manifesting your life by feeling, thinking, seeing, and being your intention in every cell of your body. Actually, that’s how I work with chronic pain as a somatic practitioner and hands-on-healer.
Group prayer can create miracles for its willing recipients.
I’m not saying only pray. I’m saying pray and take action. Harriet says: Be pro-active! Do whatever you can to stop Obama.
I’ll link to Skeptico’s classic takedown of The Secret, but really, if you have to be told that you can’t use magic to manifest your innermost desires, you’re probably past the point of listening to any sort of reason at all. I’m not at all shocked that Lady Boomer NYC is an alternative medicine provider, either; it takes the same sort of intellectual laziness to dish out bullshit medicine as it does to swallow the cockamamie logic of PUMA adherents. Only in a movement so ensconced in groupthink and conspiracy theories could such a person be thought of as an intellectual.
I’ll be liveblogging the debate over at NYU Local tonight. Stop by and take a gander.
I’m liveblogging the VP debate over at NYU Local. Yes, I know I have absolutely no connection to NYU, but just go with it, ok?
Shorter Riverdaughter: PUMAs are smarter than other Democrats because they chose Hillary Clinton, who was obviously the smarter choice.
I’ll have to file this away with “she’s obviously very mature to be dating a man my age” and “Homeopathy works because I feel better” under examples I readily use to highlight this particular fallacy.
And I’m afraid that, after the primaries — affable and intelligent as the man seems on Letterman — I have no reason to trust or respect him, or — after the shameful performance of the 2006 Congress — the Democrat Party.
“The Democrat Party”, eh? Careful Lambert, your right-wing trope is showing.
Appendix to a Completed Series
I’m not going to link to Sully’s series of arguments that Sarah Palin’s son, Trig, is OMGBBQ! actually her daughter’s child, partially because he’s written nineteen or so goddamned posts on the subject already and I don’t feel like finding them all. All I want to say is that the straw grasping, goalpost shifting, and dismissal of contradictory evidence that characterize Sullivan’s post remind me of one thing and one thing only: Texas Darlin’s neverending quest to prove that Barack Obama is a Muslim/forged his birth certificate/is a dirty n***er.
Congrats, Andy, you’re no better than a racist PUMA blogger.
[Yeah, I’m also not linking to Texas Darlin or No Quarter. They can go fuck themselves.]
I’d like to take slight issue with Shakesville’s William K. Wolfrum, namely that his contention about Hillary Clinton voters skeptical of Barack Obama:
Because at a dedicated progressive and feminist blog where numerous voices and perspectives are presented, I find the accusation that individuals that have not leaped aboard the Barack Obama bandwagon are doing so out of spite to be spiteful in their own way.
And of course this is true…partially. Every Obama skeptic is not a PUMA, nor are all Obama skeptics motivated out of spite. It’s perilous enough to start assigning motives to people whatever their opinion may be, and it’s a weak argumentative tactic, bordering on the ad hominem.
Still, I read this from Riverdaughter and start to think the spite charge has merit, at least in some instances:
She’s anti-choice. Truth: We know what she is but if Obamaphiles insist on calling us post-menopausal, dried up pussies, you shouldn’t be surprised if we are suddenly unsympathetic towards young female Obamaphiles who find themselves unintentionally pregnant. Some of us fought those battles in the 60’s. Some of us took advantage of the battles won in the 70’s and 80’s. Some of us continue to fight in the 90’s and 00’s. But we’re not your parents who are responsible for getting you out of every scrape. YOU are responsible for your own fate. If you don’t like the anti-choice leanings of your next president and vice president, work your ass off for downticket Dems so Republicans can’t ram through any more anti-choice legislation. You’re old enough. Do it yourself. Besides, you female Obamaphiles had a choice in Hillary Clinton who was committed to prtecting your reproductive freedom. Instead, you picked a man who is actively courting evangelical voters and watering down the pro-choice section of the Democratic platform. And you have the nerve to call US dumb?
Riverdaughter feels that women who voted for Obama deserve to have unwanted pregnancies without the option of abortion. Revenge against those who had the temerity to disagree with her is more important to her than political principles she claims to champion. I don’t know how you can describe this as anything other than spiteful.
We defend Sarah Palin against misogynist smears not because we endorse her or her politics, but because that’s how feminism works.
So while McEwan upholds her principles, even to protect a political adversary, Riverdaughter would throw hers under the bus if it would adversely affect an Obama-supporting woman. Not all Obama skeptics are PUMAs, nor are all Obama skeptics acting out of spite. Some obviously are, however, and it’s not a lie to say as much.